Uma vs Walden Robotics
Uma vs Walden Robotics, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Uma is on 58/100 and Walden Robotics on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Uma
- LinkedIn following: 5,831 against 31
Walden Robotics
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 49/100 against 36/100
- funding raised: $300M against $40.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Uma | Walden Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. | Building and deploying general-purpose robots that continuously learn and improve while performing real work. |
| Category | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Physical AI, Humanoid Robotics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2025 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Cambridge, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Uma | Walden Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 29 | Not published |
| Total funding | $40.0M | $300M |
| Latest round | Seed | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,831 | 31 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Uma | Walden Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 70/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | C (64/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Uma | Walden Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Uma vs Walden Robotics: common questions
Which is better, Uma or Walden Robotics?
On our 0-100 score Uma rates higher (58/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Uma and Walden Robotics compare on the numbers?
Uma leads on LinkedIn following (5,831 against 31). Walden Robotics leads on agent readiness (64/100 against 42/100), domain rating (49/100 against 36/100), funding raised ($300M against $40.0M).
Read the full Uma review and pricing or the Walden Robotics review and pricing. You can also browse other Uma alternatives we track.