Tulip vs Xyte
Tulip vs Xyte, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Tulip is on 59/100 and Xyte on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Tulip
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 388 against 50
- funding raised: $153M against $40.0M
- LinkedIn following: 31,760 against 3,533
Xyte
- headcount growth: +28.2% against +3.0%
At a glance
| Measure | Tulip | Xyte |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Tulip provides a cloud-based platform for frontline operations, empowering manufacturers to build apps for improved quality, efficiency, and traceability. | Cloud platform for hardware manufacturers to manage devices and bridge to cloud applications. |
| Category | Manufacturing, Manufacturing Software, Industrial IoT, Smart Manufacturing | Manufacturing, Management, Connected Device, Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Somerville, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Tulip | Xyte |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 388 | 50 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.0% | +28.2% |
| Total funding | $153M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | 31,760 | 3,533 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Tulip | Xyte |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Tulip | Xyte |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Support stack | Discourse | Not detected |
Tulip vs Xyte: common questions
Which is better, Tulip or Xyte?
On our 0-100 score Xyte rates higher (62/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Tulip and Xyte compare on the numbers?
Tulip leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 41/100), domain rating (73/100 against 40/100), headcount (388 against 50), funding raised ($153M against $40.0M), LinkedIn following (31,760 against 3,533). Xyte leads on headcount growth (+28.2% against +3.0%).
Read the full Tulip review and pricing or the Xyte review and pricing. You can also browse other Tulip alternatives we track.