Trieye vs Yoran Imaging
Trieye vs Yoran Imaging, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Trieye is on 63/100 and Yoran Imaging on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Trieye
- our overall score: 63/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 36/100 against 6/100
- headcount: 101 against 18
- funding raised: $96.0M against $900K
- LinkedIn following: 10,032 against 468
Yoran Imaging
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Trieye | Yoran Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Pioneering mass-market CMOS-based Short-Wave Infrared (SWIR) sensing for automotive imaging. | Thermal imaging solutions for food & beverage packaging line quality control. |
| Category | Automotive, Imaging, ADAS, Camera | Thermal, Camera, Sensor, Industry 4.0 |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Trieye | Yoran Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 101 | 18 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +37.8% |
| Total funding | $96.0M | $900K |
| Latest round | Series B | Grant |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,032 | 468 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Trieye | Yoran Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 43/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 6/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Trieye | Yoran Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4 |
Trieye vs Yoran Imaging: common questions
Which is better, Trieye or Yoran Imaging?
On our 0-100 score Trieye rates higher (63/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Trieye and Yoran Imaging compare on the numbers?
Trieye leads on our overall score (63/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (38/100 against 22/100), domain rating (36/100 against 6/100), headcount (101 against 18), funding raised ($96.0M against $900K), LinkedIn following (10,032 against 468).
Read the full Trieye review and pricing or the Yoran Imaging review and pricing. You can also browse other Trieye alternatives we track.