Trickle vs Waffle
Trickle vs Waffle, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Trickle is on 65/100 and Waffle on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Trickle
- our overall score: 65/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 65/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 56/100 against 18/100
- headcount: 17 against 4
Waffle
- funding raised: $2.1M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Trickle | Waffle |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Trickle AI allows users to turn their ideas into live apps and websites using natural language and a visual canvas. | Tell Waffle what you're working toward. We match you to an AI coach that keeps you accountable, powered by real knowledge from the creator behind it. |
| Category | No Code, Low Code, Generative AI, AI Tool | No Code, Low Code, Web Development, Game Development |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Trickle | Waffle |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +44.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $2.1M |
| LinkedIn followers | 502 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Trickle | Waffle |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 43/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 43/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (65/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 18/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Trickle | Waffle |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Trickle | Waffle |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Magic Canvas, Visual App Design, Full-Stack App Generation, Natural Language Interaction | No-code Development, AI-Powered Coding Agents, Integrated Backend Services, Reliable Web Previews, Game Creation |
Trickle vs Waffle: common questions
Which is better, Trickle or Waffle?
On our 0-100 score Trickle rates higher (65/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Trickle and Waffle compare on the numbers?
Trickle leads on our overall score (65/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (65/100 against 41/100), domain rating (56/100 against 18/100), headcount (17 against 4). Waffle leads on funding raised ($2.1M against $1.0M).
Read the full Trickle review and pricing or the Waffle review and pricing. You can also browse other Trickle alternatives we track.