Track160 vs Zone7
Track160 vs Zone7, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Track160 is on 52/100 and Zone7 on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Track160
- headcount: 34 against 19
Zone7
- our overall score: 55/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 29/100
- funding raised: $21.0M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 6,212 against 3,875
At a glance
| Measure | Track160 | Zone7 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated FIFA EPTS certified football data analytics platform for clubs and leagues. | AI-powered sports analytics platform for optimizing athlete performance and injury prevention. |
| Category | Sports, Analytics, Video, Data | Sports, Analytics, Sports Tech, AI-Driven Performance Analytics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Track160 | Zone7 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 34 | 19 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -29.6% | -25.6% |
| Total funding | $5.0M | $21.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,875 | 6,212 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Track160 | Zone7 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 46/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Track160 | Zone7 |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Track160 vs Zone7: common questions
Which is better, Track160 or Zone7?
On our 0-100 score Zone7 rates higher (55/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Track160 and Zone7 compare on the numbers?
Track160 leads on headcount (34 against 19). Zone7 leads on our overall score (55/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100), domain rating (46/100 against 29/100), funding raised ($21.0M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (6,212 against 3,875).
Read the full Track160 review and pricing or the Zone7 review and pricing. You can also browse other Track160 alternatives we track.