ThreatConnect vs Nagomi Security
ThreatConnect vs Nagomi Security, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ThreatConnect is on 47/100 and Nagomi Security on 63/100.
Where each one leads
ThreatConnect
- domain rating: 73/100 against 39/100
- funding raised: $60.0M against $30.0M
- LinkedIn following: 28,477 against 6,054
Nagomi Security
- our overall score: 63/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | ThreatConnect | Nagomi Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Threat intelligence platform for security operations, enabling proactive threat defense and risk reduction. | Proactive defense platform mapping security tools to threats and providing remediation plans. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Intelligence, Security Operations, Risk Management | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Threat Detection, Risk Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Arlington, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ThreatConnect | Nagomi Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 89 | 76 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +45.3% |
| Total funding | $60.0M | $30.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 28,477 | 6,054 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ThreatConnect | Nagomi Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 39/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ThreatConnect | Nagomi Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
ThreatConnect vs Nagomi Security: common questions
Which is better, ThreatConnect or Nagomi Security?
On our 0-100 score Nagomi Security rates higher (63/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ThreatConnect and Nagomi Security compare on the numbers?
ThreatConnect leads on domain rating (73/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($60.0M against $30.0M), LinkedIn following (28,477 against 6,054). Nagomi Security leads on our overall score (63/100 against 47/100).
Read the full ThreatConnect review and pricing or the Nagomi Security review and pricing. You can also browse other ThreatConnect alternatives we track.