Thermo Fisher Scientific vs WuXi AppTec
Thermo Fisher Scientific vs WuXi AppTec, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Thermo Fisher Scientific is on 78/100 and WuXi AppTec on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Thermo Fisher Scientific
- our overall score: 78/100 against 66/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 70/100
- headcount: 100,104 against 4,218
- funding raised: $5.5B against $40.0M
- LinkedIn following: 2,298,918 against 85,852
WuXi AppTec
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | Thermo Fisher Scientific | WuXi AppTec |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in serving science, providing analytical instruments, consumables, and services for research, diagnostics, and manufacturing. | Global CRDMO providing integrated R&D and manufacturing services for the pharmaceutical and life sciences industries. |
| Category | Life Sciences, Analytical Instruments, Laboratory Equipment, Biotechnology | Drug Discovery, Contract Research Organization (CRO), Contract Development and Manufacturing Organization (CDMO), Pharmaceutical Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 1956 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, United States | Shanghai, China |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Thermo Fisher Scientific | WuXi AppTec |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 100,104 | 4,218 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +6.0% |
| Total funding | $5.5B | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Debt | Post IPO |
| Valuation | $220B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,298,918 | 85,852 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Thermo Fisher Scientific | WuXi AppTec |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 78/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 86/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Thermo Fisher Scientific | WuXi AppTec |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Thermo Fisher Scientific vs WuXi AppTec: common questions
Which is better, Thermo Fisher Scientific or WuXi AppTec?
On our 0-100 score Thermo Fisher Scientific rates higher (78/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Thermo Fisher Scientific and WuXi AppTec compare on the numbers?
Thermo Fisher Scientific leads on our overall score (78/100 against 66/100), domain rating (86/100 against 70/100), headcount (100,104 against 4,218), funding raised ($5.5B against $40.0M), LinkedIn following (2,298,918 against 85,852). WuXi AppTec leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 22/100).
Read the full Thermo Fisher Scientific review and pricing or the WuXi AppTec review and pricing. You can also browse other Thermo Fisher Scientific alternatives we track.