Thermo Fisher Scientific vs UPTEC
Thermo Fisher Scientific vs UPTEC, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Thermo Fisher Scientific is on 78/100 and UPTEC on Not scored yet.
Where each one leads
Thermo Fisher Scientific
- headcount: 100,104 against 51
- LinkedIn following: 2,298,918 against 21,159
UPTEC
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | Thermo Fisher Scientific | UPTEC |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in serving science, providing analytical instruments, consumables, and services for research, diagnostics, and manufacturing. | Porto's leading incubator supporting early-stage companies in tech, science, and creative industries. |
| Category | Life Sciences, Analytical Instruments, Laboratory Equipment, Biotechnology | Business Incubation, Research and Development, Technology Transfer, Entrepreneurship |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1956 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, United States | Porto, Portugal |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Thermo Fisher Scientific | UPTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 100,104 | 51 |
| Total funding | $5.5B | Not published |
| Latest round | Debt | Not published |
| Valuation | $220B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,298,918 | 21,159 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Thermo Fisher Scientific | UPTEC |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 78/100 | Not published |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 99/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 86/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Thermo Fisher Scientific | UPTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
Thermo Fisher Scientific vs UPTEC: common questions
Which is better, Thermo Fisher Scientific or UPTEC?
On our 0-100 score Thermo Fisher Scientific rates higher (78/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Thermo Fisher Scientific and UPTEC compare on the numbers?
Thermo Fisher Scientific leads on headcount (100,104 against 51), LinkedIn following (2,298,918 against 21,159). UPTEC leads on agent readiness (40/100 against 22/100).
Read the full Thermo Fisher Scientific review and pricing or the UPTEC review and pricing. You can also browse other Thermo Fisher Scientific alternatives we track.