Taranis vs Tomgrow
Taranis vs Tomgrow, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Taranis is on 68/100 and Tomgrow on 19/100.
Where each one leads
Taranis
- our overall score: 68/100 against 19/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 6/100
- headcount: 204 against 20
- LinkedIn following: 19,038 against 3,740
Tomgrow
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Taranis | Tomgrow |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Taranis is a precision agriculture intelligence platform using computer vision and AI to monitor fields and prevent crop yield loss. | Agritech startup developing AI-powered solutions for precision agriculture and crop management. |
| Category | Agritech, Crop Monitoring, Satellite Imagery, AgTech | Agritech, AgTech, FoodTech, Precision Agriculture |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Westfield, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Taranis | Tomgrow |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 204 | 20 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +6.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $99.6M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,038 | 3,740 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Taranis | Tomgrow |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 19/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 13/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 40/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 76/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 6/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Taranis | Tomgrow |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Taranis vs Tomgrow: common questions
Which is better, Taranis or Tomgrow?
On our 0-100 score Taranis rates higher (68/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Taranis and Tomgrow compare on the numbers?
Taranis leads on our overall score (68/100 against 19/100), domain rating (55/100 against 6/100), headcount (204 against 20), LinkedIn following (19,038 against 3,740).
Read the full Taranis review and pricing or the Tomgrow review and pricing. You can also browse other Taranis alternatives we track.