Sweet Security vs Torq
Sweet Security vs Torq, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Sweet Security is on 63/100 and Torq on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Sweet Security
- headcount growth: +126.9% against +40.8%
Torq
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 352 against 119
- funding raised: $190M against $128M
- LinkedIn following: 41,530 against 8,963
At a glance
| Measure | Sweet Security | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud runtime security suite defending cloud workloads with offensive and defensive expertise. | Hyperautomation platform unifying and automating security infrastructure for enhanced protection and productivity. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, AppSec | Enterprise, Development, Cybersecurity, Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Sweet Security | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 119 | 352 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +126.9% | +40.8% |
| Total funding | $128M | $190M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,963 | 41,530 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Sweet Security | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 47/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Sweet Security | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Sweet Security | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Anyone have experience working at Torq?. I’m currently interviewing at Torq and while the product and client reviews look good, Repvue shows average quota attainment at 19%.”r/techsales
Sweet Security vs Torq: common questions
Which is better, Sweet Security or Torq?
On our 0-100 score Torq rates higher (65/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Sweet Security and Torq compare on the numbers?
Sweet Security leads on headcount growth (+126.9% against +40.8%). Torq leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 39/100), domain rating (70/100 against 47/100), headcount (352 against 119), funding raised ($190M against $128M), LinkedIn following (41,530 against 8,963).
What do real users say about Sweet Security and Torq?
Torq: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/techsales.
Read the full Sweet Security review and pricing or the Torq review and pricing. You can also browse other Sweet Security alternatives we track.