SupPlant vs Uplinq
SupPlant vs Uplinq, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: SupPlant is on 66/100 and Uplinq on 40/100.
Where each one leads
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $52.9M against $10.0M
Uplinq
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | SupPlant | Uplinq |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. | Bookkeeping that is actually done for you. Uplinq pairs AI-powered automation with real experts to keep your books accurate, your reporting current, and your taxes on track. |
| Category | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization | AgTech, InsurTech, AI-Driven Crop Insurance, Precision Agriculture |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Afula, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | SupPlant | Uplinq |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 55 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -13.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $52.9M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | $30.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,340 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | SupPlant | Uplinq |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 40/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | 75/100 | 40/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 37/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | SupPlant | Uplinq |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | PostHog, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
SupPlant vs Uplinq: common questions
Which is better, SupPlant or Uplinq?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do SupPlant and Uplinq compare on the numbers?
SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($52.9M against $10.0M).
Read the full SupPlant review and pricing or the Uplinq review and pricing. You can also browse other SupPlant alternatives we track.