SupPlant vs TurfBuilder
SupPlant vs TurfBuilder, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: SupPlant is on 66/100 and TurfBuilder on 7/100.
Where each one leads
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 4/100
TurfBuilder
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | SupPlant | TurfBuilder |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. | TurfBuilder is a platform that helps lawn care professionals manage their businesses more efficiently. |
| Category | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization | AgTech, Vertical SaaS, Lawn Care, Landscaping |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | Afula, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | SupPlant | TurfBuilder |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 55 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -13.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $52.9M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | $30.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,340 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | SupPlant | TurfBuilder |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 75/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 4/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | SupPlant | TurfBuilder |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
SupPlant vs TurfBuilder: common questions
Which is better, SupPlant or TurfBuilder?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do SupPlant and TurfBuilder compare on the numbers?
SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 37/100), domain rating (38/100 against 4/100).
Read the full SupPlant review and pricing or the TurfBuilder review and pricing. You can also browse other SupPlant alternatives we track.