Stream Security vs Sweet Security
Stream Security vs Sweet Security, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Stream Security is on 65/100 and Sweet Security on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Stream Security
- domain rating: 58/100 against 47/100
- LinkedIn following: 14,380 against 8,963
Sweet Security
- headcount: 119 against 64
- headcount growth: +126.9% against -27.1%
- funding raised: $128M against $60.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Stream Security | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automates security vulnerability detection and remediation with immediate root cause analysis using a live system model. | Cloud runtime security suite defending cloud workloads with offensive and defensive expertise. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, AppSec |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Stream Security | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 64 | 119 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -27.1% | +126.9% |
| Total funding | $60.0M | $128M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,380 | 8,963 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Stream Security | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Stream Security | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Stream Security vs Sweet Security: common questions
Which is better, Stream Security or Sweet Security?
On our 0-100 score Stream Security rates higher (65/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Stream Security and Sweet Security compare on the numbers?
Stream Security leads on domain rating (58/100 against 47/100), LinkedIn following (14,380 against 8,963). Sweet Security leads on headcount (119 against 64), headcount growth (+126.9% against -27.1%), funding raised ($128M against $60.0M).
Read the full Stream Security review and pricing or the Sweet Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Stream Security alternatives we track.