Stormfisher vs Uravu Labs
Stormfisher vs Uravu Labs, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Stormfisher is on 62/100 and Uravu Labs on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Stormfisher
- our overall score: 62/100 against 53/100
- funding raised: $430M against $2.3M
Uravu Labs
- domain rating: 41/100 against 34/100
At a glance
| Measure | Stormfisher | Uravu Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops, owns, and operates industrial-scale facilities producing green hydrogen derived e-Fuels. | Climate-tech startup developing technology to extract high-quality drinking water from atmospheric moisture using renewables. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Clean Energy, Green Hydrogen, Hydrogen | Climate Tech, Water Technology, Sustainability, Deep Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Hardware |
| Founded | 2006 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | London, Canada | Bengaluru, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Stormfisher | Uravu Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 53 | 59 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +46.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $430M | $2.3M |
| Latest round | PE Round | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,514 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Stormfisher | Uravu Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Stormfisher | Uravu Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Stormfisher vs Uravu Labs: common questions
Which is better, Stormfisher or Uravu Labs?
On our 0-100 score Stormfisher rates higher (62/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Stormfisher and Uravu Labs compare on the numbers?
Stormfisher leads on our overall score (62/100 against 53/100), funding raised ($430M against $2.3M). Uravu Labs leads on domain rating (41/100 against 34/100).
Read the full Stormfisher review and pricing or the Uravu Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other Stormfisher alternatives we track.

