Stormfisher vs Undo
Stormfisher vs Undo, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Stormfisher is on 62/100 and Undo on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Stormfisher
- our overall score: 62/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 33/100 against 26/100
- domain rating: 34/100 against 2/100
- funding raised: $430M against $49.0M
Undo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Stormfisher | Undo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops, owns, and operates industrial-scale facilities producing green hydrogen derived e-Fuels. | Carbon removal services using enhanced rock weathering to combat climate change. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Clean Energy, Green Hydrogen, Hydrogen | Climate Tech, Carbon Removal, Enhanced Rock Weathering, Sustainability |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2006 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | London, Canada | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Stormfisher | Undo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 53 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +46.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $430M | $49.0M |
| Latest round | PE Round | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,514 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Stormfisher | Undo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 38/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Stormfisher | Undo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Stormfisher vs Undo: common questions
Which is better, Stormfisher or Undo?
On our 0-100 score Stormfisher rates higher (62/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Stormfisher and Undo compare on the numbers?
Stormfisher leads on our overall score (62/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (33/100 against 26/100), domain rating (34/100 against 2/100), funding raised ($430M against $49.0M).
Read the full Stormfisher review and pricing or the Undo review and pricing. You can also browse other Stormfisher alternatives we track.