Storj vs Wasabi Technologies
Storj vs Wasabi Technologies, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Storj is on 41/100 and Wasabi Technologies on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Storj
- funding raised: $973M against $250M
- LinkedIn following: 8,019 against 115
Wasabi Technologies
- our overall score: 47/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 300 against 52
At a glance
| Measure | Storj | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Decentralized cloud object storage platform for developers, offering secure, private, and cost-effective storage. | Cloud storage provider offering affordable, high-performance, and secure object storage. |
| Category | Cloud Storage, Decentralized Storage, Object Storage, Data Storage | Cloud Storage, Cloud Infrastructure, Data Storage, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Atlanta, United States | Boston, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Storj | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 52 | 300 |
| Total funding | $973M | $250M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,019 | 115 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Storj | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 12/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Storj | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Plausible | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Storj vs Wasabi Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Storj or Wasabi Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Wasabi Technologies rates higher (47/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Storj and Wasabi Technologies compare on the numbers?
Storj leads on funding raised ($973M against $250M), LinkedIn following (8,019 against 115). Wasabi Technologies leads on our overall score (47/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 48/100), headcount (300 against 52).
Read the full Storj review and pricing or the Wasabi Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Storj alternatives we track.