Steakholder Foods vs Upside Foods
Steakholder Foods vs Upside Foods, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Steakholder Foods is on 49/100 and Upside Foods on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Steakholder Foods
- agent readiness: 33/100 against 25/100
Upside Foods
- our overall score: 61/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 65/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 225 against 38
- LinkedIn following: 44,676 against 12,878
At a glance
| Measure | Steakholder Foods | Upside Foods |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops and produces cultivated meat products using 3D bioprinting technology for sustainable, slaughter-free meat. | Develops and produces cultivated meat for consumption, aiming to create a more sustainable food system. |
| Category | Food, Biotech, Meat, 3D Printing | FoodTech, Cellular Agriculture, Lab-Grown Meat, Sustainable Food |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Food production |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Yavne, Israel | Berkeley, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Steakholder Foods | Upside Foods |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 38 | 225 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -12.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $217M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,878 | 44,676 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Steakholder Foods | Upside Foods |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 16/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 43/100 | 65/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Steakholder Foods | Upside Foods |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Hotjar | Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel |
Steakholder Foods vs Upside Foods: common questions
Which is better, Steakholder Foods or Upside Foods?
On our 0-100 score Upside Foods rates higher (61/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Steakholder Foods and Upside Foods compare on the numbers?
Steakholder Foods leads on agent readiness (33/100 against 25/100). Upside Foods leads on our overall score (61/100 against 49/100), domain rating (65/100 against 43/100), headcount (225 against 38), LinkedIn following (44,676 against 12,878).
Read the full Steakholder Foods review and pricing or the Upside Foods review and pricing. You can also browse other Steakholder Foods alternatives we track.