StarkWare vs Swash
StarkWare vs Swash, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: StarkWare is on 73/100 and Swash on 51/100.
Where each one leads
StarkWare
- our overall score: 73/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 194 against 18
- funding raised: $180M against $19.1M
- LinkedIn following: 20,607 against 3,720
Swash
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | StarkWare | Swash |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops blockchain scaling solutions using STARK technology for Ethereum-secure, fast, and seamless user experiences. | A data union that rewards users for their data, enabling a fairer digital economy. |
| Category | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Cryptocurrency | Data Monetization, Data Union, Web3, Privacy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | StarkWare | Swash |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 194 | 18 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +15.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $180M | $19.1M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $8.0B | $5.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,607 | 3,720 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | StarkWare | Swash |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 73/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | StarkWare | Swash |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Walletconnect | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
StarkWare vs Swash: common questions
Which is better, StarkWare or Swash?
On our 0-100 score StarkWare rates higher (73/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do StarkWare and Swash compare on the numbers?
StarkWare leads on our overall score (73/100 against 51/100), domain rating (71/100 against 40/100), headcount (194 against 18), funding raised ($180M against $19.1M), LinkedIn following (20,607 against 3,720). Swash leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 30/100).
Read the full StarkWare review and pricing or the Swash review and pricing. You can also browse other StarkWare alternatives we track.