SpiderOak vs Zscaler
SpiderOak vs Zscaler, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: SpiderOak is on 42/100 and Zscaler on 70/100.
Where each one leads
SpiderOak
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Zscaler
- our overall score: 70/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 71/100
- funding raised: $148M against $20.0M
At a glance
| Measure | SpiderOak | Zscaler |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Secure, private cloud storage and collaboration for individuals and businesses. | Securing the enterprise AI journey. |
| Category | Cloud Storage, Data Security, Collaboration Software, End-to-End Encryption | Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2007 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Kansas City, United States | San Jose, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | SpiderOak | Zscaler |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 6,000 |
| Total funding | $20.0M | $148M |
| Latest round | Series B | Post-IPO Equity |
| Valuation | Not published | $11B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | SpiderOak | Zscaler |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 42/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 40/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | SpiderOak | Zscaler |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
SpiderOak vs Zscaler: common questions
Which is better, SpiderOak or Zscaler?
On our 0-100 score Zscaler rates higher (70/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do SpiderOak and Zscaler compare on the numbers?
Zscaler leads on our overall score (70/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 40/100), domain rating (83/100 against 71/100), funding raised ($148M against $20.0M).
Read the full SpiderOak review and pricing or the Zscaler review and pricing. You can also browse other SpiderOak alternatives we track.