SpiderOak vs TeamViewer
SpiderOak vs TeamViewer, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: SpiderOak is on 42/100 and TeamViewer on 60/100.
Where each one leads
SpiderOak
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
TeamViewer
- our overall score: 60/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 71/100
- funding raised: $360M against $20.0M
At a glance
| Measure | SpiderOak | TeamViewer |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Secure, private cloud storage and collaboration for individuals and businesses. | Global provider of remote connectivity, IT support, and digital workplace solutions. |
| Category | Cloud Storage, Data Security, Collaboration Software, End-to-End Encryption | Remote Access Software, IT Support, Digital Workplace Solutions, Augmented Reality |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2007 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Kansas City, United States | Göppingen, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | SpiderOak | TeamViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 2,725 |
| Total funding | $20.0M | $360M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 198,604 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | SpiderOak | TeamViewer |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 42/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | SpiderOak | TeamViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
SpiderOak vs TeamViewer: common questions
Which is better, SpiderOak or TeamViewer?
On our 0-100 score TeamViewer rates higher (60/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do SpiderOak and TeamViewer compare on the numbers?
TeamViewer leads on our overall score (60/100 against 42/100), domain rating (92/100 against 71/100), funding raised ($360M against $20.0M).
Read the full SpiderOak review and pricing or the TeamViewer review and pricing. You can also browse other SpiderOak alternatives we track.