Speedata vs SQream
Speedata vs SQream, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Speedata is on 62/100 and SQream on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Speedata
- our overall score: 62/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 103 against 42
- headcount growth: +28.5% against -27.8%
- funding raised: $158M against $118M
SQream
- domain rating: 52/100 against 19/100
- LinkedIn following: 13,741 against 5,497
At a glance
| Measure | Speedata | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops the C200 Analytics Processing Unit (APU), an ASIC for massive-scale analytics. | SQream provides a GPU-accelerated data analytics platform for rapidly analyzing massive datasets at scale. |
| Category | Enterprise, Analytics, Data, VLSI | Analytics, Enterprise, SQL, Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Speedata | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 103 | 42 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +28.5% | -27.8% |
| Total funding | $158M | $118M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,497 | 13,741 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Speedata | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 19/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Speedata | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Wix | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Speedata | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 6 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Why SQream uses Haskell.”r/haskell
Speedata vs SQream: common questions
Which is better, Speedata or SQream?
On our 0-100 score Speedata rates higher (62/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Speedata and SQream compare on the numbers?
Speedata leads on our overall score (62/100 against 48/100), headcount (103 against 42), headcount growth (+28.5% against -27.8%), funding raised ($158M against $118M). SQream leads on domain rating (52/100 against 19/100), LinkedIn following (13,741 against 5,497).
What do real users say about Speedata and SQream?
SQream: 6 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/haskell.
Read the full Speedata review and pricing or the SQream review and pricing. You can also browse other Speedata alternatives we track.