SpaceX vs URSA MAJOR
SpaceX vs URSA MAJOR, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: SpaceX is on 78/100 and URSA MAJOR on 71/100.
Where each one leads
SpaceX
- our overall score: 78/100 against 71/100
- domain rating: 85/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 18,154 against 464
- funding raised: $10.0B against $100M
URSA MAJOR
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 28/100
At a glance
| Measure | SpaceX | URSA MAJOR |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Designs, manufactures, and launches advanced rockets and spacecraft, aiming to make humanity multiplanetary. | Designs and manufactures flight-proven aerospace and defense systems, including rocket engines and hypersonic capabilities. |
| Category | SpaceTech, Satellite, Rocketry, Human Spaceflight | Defense Tech, SpaceTech, Hypersonics, Rocket Engines |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | services | platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2002 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Starbase, United States | Berthoud, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | SpaceX | URSA MAJOR |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18,154 | 464 |
| Total funding | $10.0B | $100M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| Valuation | $800K | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 57,715 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | SpaceX | URSA MAJOR |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 78/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 50/100 | Not published |
| Community | 20/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 49/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 97/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (28/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 85/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | SpaceX | URSA MAJOR |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Angular | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
SpaceX vs URSA MAJOR: common questions
Which is better, SpaceX or URSA MAJOR?
On our 0-100 score SpaceX rates higher (78/100 against 71/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do SpaceX and URSA MAJOR compare on the numbers?
SpaceX leads on our overall score (78/100 against 71/100), domain rating (85/100 against 51/100), headcount (18,154 against 464), funding raised ($10.0B against $100M). URSA MAJOR leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 28/100).
Read the full SpaceX review and pricing or the URSA MAJOR review and pricing. You can also browse other SpaceX alternatives we track.