Sourcegraph vs Swimm
Sourcegraph vs Swimm, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Sourcegraph is on 61/100 and Swimm on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Sourcegraph
- our overall score: 61/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 64/100
- funding raised: $218M against $27.6M
Swimm
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 40/100
At a glance
| Measure | Sourcegraph | Swimm |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Universal code search and intelligence platform for developers and AI coding agents. | Application understanding platform for modernizing and maintaining legacy code. |
| Category | Developer Tools, Code Intelligence, AI Coding Assistant, Universal Code Search | Enterprise, Development, Knowledge Management, Application Understanding Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Sourcegraph | Swimm |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 61 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.4% |
| Total funding | $218M | $27.6M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 9,161 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Sourcegraph | Swimm |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 8/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Sourcegraph | Swimm |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Svelte | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Segment |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Sourcegraph vs Swimm: common questions
Which is better, Sourcegraph or Swimm?
On our 0-100 score Sourcegraph rates higher (61/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Sourcegraph and Swimm compare on the numbers?
Sourcegraph leads on our overall score (61/100 against 57/100), domain rating (80/100 against 64/100), funding raised ($218M against $27.6M). Swimm leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 40/100).
Read the full Sourcegraph review and pricing or the Swimm review and pricing. You can also browse other Sourcegraph alternatives we track.