SkySQL vs Supabase
SkySQL vs Supabase, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: SkySQL is on 39/100 and Supabase on 70/100.
Where each one leads
SkySQL
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Supabase
- our overall score: 70/100 against 39/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 53/100
- funding raised: $933M against $42.0M
- LinkedIn following: 99,093 against 26,870
At a glance
| Measure | SkySQL | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides enterprise-grade database solutions based on the open-source MariaDB, offering advanced features, security, and scalability. | Open source Firebase alternative with a PostgreSQL backend and real-time capabilities. |
| Category | Database, Enterprise Software, Cloud Infrastructure, Open Source | Database, Backend as a Service, Developer Tools, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | SkySQL | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 368 | 342 |
| Total funding | $42.0M | $933M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $11B |
| LinkedIn followers | 26,870 | 99,093 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | SkySQL | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 72/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | SkySQL | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | SkySQL | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“A disappointment is that the publicly traded company at mariadb.com is discontinuing two excellent hosted Database as a Service (DBaaS), offerings: Skysql and Xpand Read full news here: MariaDB[.com] ditches products and staff in restructur”r/Cloud
SkySQL vs Supabase: common questions
Which is better, SkySQL or Supabase?
On our 0-100 score Supabase rates higher (70/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do SkySQL and Supabase compare on the numbers?
Supabase leads on our overall score (70/100 against 39/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 53/100), funding raised ($933M against $42.0M), LinkedIn following (99,093 against 26,870).
What do real users say about SkySQL and Supabase?
SkySQL: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Cloud.
Read the full SkySQL review and pricing or the Supabase review and pricing. You can also browse other SkySQL alternatives we track.