Sinequa vs Starburst
Sinequa vs Starburst, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Sinequa is on 48/100 and Starburst on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Sinequa
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 40/100
Starburst
- our overall score: 67/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 59/100
- funding raised: $414M against $28.2M
At a glance
| Measure | Sinequa | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered enterprise search and analytics platform for knowledge discovery and productivity. | Data platform for apps and AI, unifying distributed data for analytics and AI innovation. |
| Category | AI, SaaS, Enterprise Search, Analytics | AI, AI Infrastructure, Analytics, Analytics Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2002 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Sinequa | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 537 |
| Total funding | $28.2M | $414M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 50,638 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Sinequa | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Sinequa | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Matomo | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Sinequa vs Starburst: common questions
Which is better, Sinequa or Starburst?
On our 0-100 score Starburst rates higher (67/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Sinequa and Starburst compare on the numbers?
Sinequa leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 40/100). Starburst leads on our overall score (67/100 against 48/100), domain rating (74/100 against 59/100), funding raised ($414M against $28.2M).
Read the full Sinequa review and pricing or the Starburst review and pricing. You can also browse other Sinequa alternatives we track.