Silk vs YugabyteDB
Silk vs YugabyteDB, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Silk is on 63/100 and YugabyteDB on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Silk
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
YugabyteDB
- our overall score: 67/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 50/100
- LinkedIn following: 43,532 against 5,024
At a glance
| Measure | Silk | YugabyteDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Silk provides a data virtualization platform for cloud workloads, accelerating performance without refactoring. | Distributed SQL database for cloud-native applications, offering high availability and horizontal scalability. |
| Category | Database, Enterprise, Optimization, Virtualization | Database, Distributed SQL, Cloud Native, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2008 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | Sunnyvale, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Silk | YugabyteDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 490 | 470 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +25.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $238M | $266M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series C |
| Valuation | $550M | $1.3B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,024 | 43,532 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Silk | YugabyteDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Silk | YugabyteDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Silk vs YugabyteDB: common questions
Which is better, Silk or YugabyteDB?
On our 0-100 score YugabyteDB rates higher (67/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Silk and YugabyteDB compare on the numbers?
YugabyteDB leads on our overall score (67/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 21/100), domain rating (72/100 against 50/100), LinkedIn following (43,532 against 5,024).
Read the full Silk review and pricing or the YugabyteDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Silk alternatives we track.