Silk vs Xata
Silk vs Xata, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Silk is on 63/100 and Xata on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Silk
- our overall score: 63/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 490 against 27
- headcount growth: +25.0% against -30.8%
- funding raised: $238M against $35.0M
Xata
- agent readiness: 62/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 50/100
At a glance
| Measure | Silk | Xata |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Silk provides a data virtualization platform for cloud workloads, accelerating performance without refactoring. | Open-source Postgres platform for agent scale with copy-on-write branching. |
| Category | Database, Enterprise, Optimization, Virtualization | Database, Open Source, Developer Tools, Cloud Native |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2008 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Silk | Xata |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 490 | 27 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +25.0% | -30.8% |
| Total funding | $238M | $35.0M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series A |
| Valuation | $550M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,024 | 4,967 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Silk | Xata |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | C (62/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Silk | Xata |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Silk vs Xata: common questions
Which is better, Silk or Xata?
On our 0-100 score Silk rates higher (63/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Silk and Xata compare on the numbers?
Silk leads on our overall score (63/100 against 59/100), headcount (490 against 27), headcount growth (+25.0% against -30.8%), funding raised ($238M against $35.0M). Xata leads on agent readiness (62/100 against 21/100), domain rating (70/100 against 50/100).
Read the full Silk review and pricing or the Xata review and pricing. You can also browse other Silk alternatives we track.