Silk vs Supabase
Silk vs Supabase, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Silk is on 63/100 and Supabase on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Silk
- headcount: 490 against 342
Supabase
- our overall score: 70/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 50/100
- funding raised: $933M against $238M
- LinkedIn following: 99,093 against 5,024
At a glance
| Measure | Silk | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Silk provides a data virtualization platform for cloud workloads, accelerating performance without refactoring. | Open source Firebase alternative with a PostgreSQL backend and real-time capabilities. |
| Category | Database, Enterprise, Optimization, Virtualization | Database, Backend as a Service, Developer Tools, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2008 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Silk | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 490 | 342 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +25.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $238M | $933M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series D |
| Valuation | $550M | $11B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,024 | 99,093 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Silk | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 72/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Silk | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Silk vs Supabase: common questions
Which is better, Silk or Supabase?
On our 0-100 score Supabase rates higher (70/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Silk and Supabase compare on the numbers?
Silk leads on headcount (490 against 342). Supabase leads on our overall score (70/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 21/100), domain rating (91/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($933M against $238M), LinkedIn following (99,093 against 5,024).
Read the full Silk review and pricing or the Supabase review and pricing. You can also browse other Silk alternatives we track.