Shockwave Security vs Sweet Security
Shockwave Security vs Sweet Security, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Shockwave Security is on 33/100 and Sweet Security on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Shockwave Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Sweet Security
- our overall score: 63/100 against 33/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 47/100 against 16/100
- headcount: 119 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 8,963 against 1,374
At a glance
| Measure | Shockwave Security | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Attack Surface Resistance Platform protecting businesses from externally facing application security threats. | Cloud runtime security suite defending cloud workloads with offensive and defensive expertise. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, AppSec, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, AppSec |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Shockwave Security | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 119 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +126.9% |
| Total funding | Not published | $128M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,374 | 8,963 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Shockwave Security | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 33/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 16/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Shockwave Security | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
Shockwave Security vs Sweet Security: common questions
Which is better, Shockwave Security or Sweet Security?
On our 0-100 score Sweet Security rates higher (63/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Shockwave Security and Sweet Security compare on the numbers?
Sweet Security leads on our overall score (63/100 against 33/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 21/100), domain rating (47/100 against 16/100), headcount (119 against 2), LinkedIn following (8,963 against 1,374).
Read the full Shockwave Security review and pricing or the Sweet Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Shockwave Security alternatives we track.