ShareOne vs Thought Machine
ShareOne vs Thought Machine, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ShareOne is on 51/100 and Thought Machine on 57/100.
Where each one leads
ShareOne
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 37/100
Thought Machine
- our overall score: 57/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 13/100
- funding raised: $504M against $51.1M
At a glance
| Measure | ShareOne | Thought Machine |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Core and digital banking solutions provider for credit unions. | Cloud-native core banking platform enabling banks to build and launch new products. |
| Category | Fintech, Core Banking, Digital Banking, Credit Union Software | Fintech, Core Banking, Digital Banking, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 1977 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Memphis, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ShareOne | Thought Machine |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 521 |
| Open roles | Not published | 43 |
| Total funding | $51.1M | $504M |
| Latest round | Series A | Undisclosed |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 74,486 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ShareOne | Thought Machine |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 20/100 |
| Community | Not published | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 22/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 13/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ShareOne | Thought Machine |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | ShareOne | Thought Machine |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
ShareOne vs Thought Machine: common questions
Which is better, ShareOne or Thought Machine?
On our 0-100 score Thought Machine rates higher (57/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ShareOne and Thought Machine compare on the numbers?
ShareOne leads on agent readiness (44/100 against 37/100). Thought Machine leads on our overall score (57/100 against 51/100), domain rating (69/100 against 13/100), funding raised ($504M against $51.1M).
Read the full ShareOne review and pricing or the Thought Machine review and pricing. You can also browse other ShareOne alternatives we track.