Serif Health vs Turquoise Health
Serif Health vs Turquoise Health, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Serif Health is on 28/100 and Turquoise Health on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Serif Health
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 38/100
Turquoise Health
- our overall score: 58/100 against 28/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 169 against 24
- funding raised: $95.0M against $2.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Serif Health | Turquoise Health |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Healthcare price transparency data and intelligence provider. | A multi-sided healthcare pricing and payment platform addressing administrative spend and price transparency. |
| Category | HealthTech, Data Analytics, Healthcare, Healthcare Data | HealthTech, Fintech, Healthcare, SaaS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Diego, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Serif Health | Turquoise Health |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 24 | 169 |
| Total funding | $2.5M | $95.0M |
| Latest round | Growth | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,061 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Serif Health | Turquoise Health |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 28/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 32/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 4/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Serif Health | Turquoise Health |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Astro, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, PostHog, Fathom | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Serif Health vs Turquoise Health: common questions
Which is better, Serif Health or Turquoise Health?
On our 0-100 score Turquoise Health rates higher (58/100 against 28/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Serif Health and Turquoise Health compare on the numbers?
Serif Health leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 38/100). Turquoise Health leads on our overall score (58/100 against 28/100), domain rating (59/100 against 48/100), headcount (169 against 24), funding raised ($95.0M against $2.5M).
Read the full Serif Health review and pricing or the Turquoise Health review and pricing. You can also browse other Serif Health alternatives we track.