Seraphim Space vs Stoke Space
Seraphim Space vs Stoke Space, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Seraphim Space is on 61/100 and Stoke Space on 73/100.
Where each one leads
Seraphim Space
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 39/100
Stoke Space
- our overall score: 73/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 423 against 36
- funding raised: $1.3B against $100M
At a glance
| Measure | Seraphim Space | Stoke Space |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global venture capital firm investing in the SpaceTech sector. | Developing fully reusable rockets for low-cost, on-demand access to and from space. |
| Category | SpaceTech, Venture Capital, Investment Management | SpaceTech, Reusable Rockets, Aerospace, Launch Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Kent, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Seraphim Space | Stoke Space |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 36 | 423 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +63.5% |
| Total funding | $100M | $1.3B |
| Latest round | Venture Fund | Series D |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 74,179 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Seraphim Space | Stoke Space |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Seraphim Space | Stoke Space |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Seraphim Space | Stoke Space |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
Seraphim Space vs Stoke Space: common questions
Which is better, Seraphim Space or Stoke Space?
On our 0-100 score Stoke Space rates higher (73/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Seraphim Space and Stoke Space compare on the numbers?
Seraphim Space leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 39/100). Stoke Space leads on our overall score (73/100 against 61/100), headcount (423 against 36), funding raised ($1.3B against $100M).
Read the full Seraphim Space review and pricing or the Stoke Space review and pricing. You can also browse other Seraphim Space alternatives we track.