Sentera vs Treetoscope
Sentera vs Treetoscope, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Sentera is on 59/100 and Treetoscope on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Sentera
- our overall score: 59/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 51/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 88 against 40
- funding raised: $53.0M against $7.0M
- LinkedIn following: 9,460 against 5,811
Treetoscope
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Sentera | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Sentera develops precision agriculture technology providing imagery and data-driven insights. | Agritech company developing a device to measure plant water consumption and irrigation needs. |
| Category | Not published | Agritech, Sensor, Irrigation, AgTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | platform | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Minneapolis, USA | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Sentera | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 88 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +35.0% |
| Total funding | $53.0M | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,460 | 5,811 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Sentera | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Sentera | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Sentera vs Treetoscope: common questions
Which is better, Sentera or Treetoscope?
On our 0-100 score Sentera rates higher (59/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Sentera and Treetoscope compare on the numbers?
Sentera leads on our overall score (59/100 against 56/100), domain rating (51/100 against 29/100), headcount (88 against 40), funding raised ($53.0M against $7.0M), LinkedIn following (9,460 against 5,811). Treetoscope leads on agent readiness (36/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Sentera review and pricing or the Treetoscope review and pricing. You can also browse other Sentera alternatives we track.