SenSwim vs Track160
SenSwim vs Track160, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: SenSwim is on 45/100 and Track160 on 52/100.
Where each one leads
SenSwim
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 21/100
- headcount growth: -11.0% against -29.6%
Track160
- our overall score: 52/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 29/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 34 against 2
- funding raised: $5.0M against $1.3M
- LinkedIn following: 3,875 against 253
At a glance
| Measure | SenSwim | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered, wearable-free real-time swimming analysis system for coaches and athletes. | Automated FIFA EPTS certified football data analytics platform for clubs and leagues. |
| Category | Sports, Sports Tech, Computer Vision, Performance Analytics | Sports, Analytics, Video, Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | SenSwim | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -11.0% | -29.6% |
| Total funding | $1.3M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 253 | 3,875 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | SenSwim | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 5/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | SenSwim | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
SenSwim vs Track160: common questions
Which is better, SenSwim or Track160?
On our 0-100 score Track160 rates higher (52/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do SenSwim and Track160 compare on the numbers?
SenSwim leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 21/100), headcount growth (-11.0% against -29.6%). Track160 leads on our overall score (52/100 against 45/100), domain rating (29/100 against 5/100), headcount (34 against 2), funding raised ($5.0M against $1.3M), LinkedIn following (3,875 against 253).
Read the full SenSwim review and pricing or the Track160 review and pricing. You can also browse other SenSwim alternatives we track.