SEMAFOR vs The New York Times
SEMAFOR vs The New York Times, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: SEMAFOR is on 48/100 and The New York Times on 26/100.
Where each one leads
SEMAFOR
- our overall score: 48/100 against 26/100
The New York Times
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 94/100 against 82/100
- headcount: 14,326 against 163
- LinkedIn following: 6,921,904 against 29,706
At a glance
| Measure | SEMAFOR | The New York Times |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global intelligence news platform providing transparent, distilled views and diverse perspectives for a curious, global audience. | A leading global news organization dedicated to independent, deeply reported journalism. |
| Category | News Platform, Journalism, Global News, Media | News, Media, Journalism, Publishing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | SEMAFOR | The New York Times |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 163 | 14,326 |
| Total funding | $40.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 29,706 | 6,921,904 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | SEMAFOR | The New York Times |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 26/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 43/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 25/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 94/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | SEMAFOR | The New York Times |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks | Astro | Not detected |
SEMAFOR vs The New York Times: common questions
Which is better, SEMAFOR or The New York Times?
On our 0-100 score SEMAFOR rates higher (48/100 against 26/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do SEMAFOR and The New York Times compare on the numbers?
SEMAFOR leads on our overall score (48/100 against 26/100). The New York Times leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 40/100), domain rating (94/100 against 82/100), headcount (14,326 against 163), LinkedIn following (6,921,904 against 29,706).
Read the full SEMAFOR review and pricing or the The New York Times review and pricing. You can also browse other SEMAFOR alternatives we track.