Sedgwick vs Shift Technology
Sedgwick vs Shift Technology, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Sedgwick is on 69/100 and Shift Technology on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Sedgwick
- our overall score: 69/100 against 65/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 22,509 against 604
- funding raised: $1.0B against $320M
Shift Technology
- LinkedIn following: 49,147 against 637
At a glance
| Measure | Sedgwick | Shift Technology |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global provider of claims management, loss adjusting, and technology-enabled business solutions. | AI-powered platform for insurance decision automation, fraud detection, and claims management. |
| Category | Claims Management, Loss Adjusting, Risk Management, Benefits Administration | InsurTech, AI, Fraud Detection, Claims Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 1969 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Memphis, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Sedgwick | Shift Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22,509 | 604 |
| Total funding | $1.0B | $320M |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Series D |
| Valuation | $13B | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 637 | 49,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Sedgwick | Shift Technology |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 45/100 |
| Quality | 89/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Sedgwick | Shift Technology |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Fathom | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Sedgwick vs Shift Technology: common questions
Which is better, Sedgwick or Shift Technology?
On our 0-100 score Sedgwick rates higher (69/100 against 65/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Sedgwick and Shift Technology compare on the numbers?
Sedgwick leads on our overall score (69/100 against 65/100), domain rating (76/100 against 61/100), headcount (22,509 against 604), funding raised ($1.0B against $320M). Shift Technology leads on LinkedIn following (49,147 against 637).
Read the full Sedgwick review and pricing or the Shift Technology review and pricing. You can also browse other Sedgwick alternatives we track.