Searxly vs TradingView
Searxly vs TradingView, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Searxly is on 9/100 and TradingView on 75/100.
Where each one leads
Searxly
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
TradingView
- our overall score: 75/100 against 9/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 0/100
At a glance
| Measure | Searxly | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Privacy-first browser for Mac and iPhone with a personal SearXNG engine, on-device AI, and self-custody wallet. | Global platform for traders and investors with advanced charting and market data. |
| Category | Privacy-Focused Browser, Web Search, AI Search Engine, On-Device AI | Fintech, Marketplace, Data Platform, Analytics Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2026 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Not published | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Searxly | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 2,773 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +27.5% |
| Total funding | Not published | $389M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 100,288 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Searxly | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 9/100 | 75/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 59/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Searxly | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Bootstrap | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Searxly | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | Not published | $15 coupon |
Searxly vs TradingView: common questions
Which is better, Searxly or TradingView?
On our 0-100 score TradingView rates higher (75/100 against 9/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Searxly and TradingView compare on the numbers?
TradingView leads on our overall score (75/100 against 9/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 41/100), domain rating (91/100 against 0/100).
Read the full Searxly review and pricing or the TradingView review and pricing. You can also browse other Searxly alternatives we track.