ScyllaDB vs Supabase
ScyllaDB vs Supabase, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ScyllaDB is on 67/100 and Supabase on 70/100.
Where each one leads
ScyllaDB
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Supabase
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 342 against 225
- funding raised: $933M against $101M
- LinkedIn following: 99,093 against 28,743
At a glance
| Measure | ScyllaDB | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ScyllaDB is a high-performance, low-latency NoSQL database for data-intensive applications, designed to scale with modern infrastructure. | Open source Firebase alternative with a PostgreSQL backend and real-time capabilities. |
| Category | Database, Enterprise, NoSQL, NoSQL Database | Database, Backend as a Service, Developer Tools, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ScyllaDB | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 225 | 342 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $101M | $933M |
| Latest round | Debt | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $11B |
| LinkedIn followers | 28,743 | 99,093 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ScyllaDB | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 72/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ScyllaDB | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | ScyllaDB | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“My custom RDBMS is 588,235x faster than ScyllaDB on my laptop with fsync on executing a complex HTAP query.”r/Database
ScyllaDB vs Supabase: common questions
Which is better, ScyllaDB or Supabase?
On our 0-100 score Supabase rates higher (70/100 against 67/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ScyllaDB and Supabase compare on the numbers?
Supabase leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 46/100), domain rating (91/100 against 73/100), headcount (342 against 225), funding raised ($933M against $101M), LinkedIn following (99,093 against 28,743).
What do real users say about ScyllaDB and Supabase?
ScyllaDB: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Database.
Read the full ScyllaDB review and pricing or the Supabase review and pricing. You can also browse other ScyllaDB alternatives we track.