ScyllaDB vs SereneDB
ScyllaDB vs SereneDB, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ScyllaDB is on 67/100 and SereneDB on 49/100.
Where each one leads
ScyllaDB
- our overall score: 67/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 12/100
- funding raised: $101M against $3.8M
SereneDB
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | ScyllaDB | SereneDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ScyllaDB is a high-performance, low-latency NoSQL database for data-intensive applications, designed to scale with modern infrastructure. | A real-time search analytics database unifying search and analytics in a single platform. |
| Category | Database, Enterprise, NoSQL, NoSQL Database | Database, Cloud Infrastructure, Serverless, Developer Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ScyllaDB | SereneDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 225 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $101M | $3.8M |
| Latest round | Debt | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 28,743 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ScyllaDB | SereneDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 33/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 8/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 12/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ScyllaDB | SereneDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Google Cloud |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | ScyllaDB | SereneDB |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“My custom RDBMS is 588,235x faster than ScyllaDB on my laptop with fsync on executing a complex HTAP query.”r/Database
ScyllaDB vs SereneDB: common questions
Which is better, ScyllaDB or SereneDB?
On our 0-100 score ScyllaDB rates higher (67/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ScyllaDB and SereneDB compare on the numbers?
ScyllaDB leads on our overall score (67/100 against 49/100), domain rating (73/100 against 12/100), funding raised ($101M against $3.8M).
What do real users say about ScyllaDB and SereneDB?
ScyllaDB: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Database.
Read the full ScyllaDB review and pricing or the SereneDB review and pricing. You can also browse other ScyllaDB alternatives we track.