Schrödinger vs Uncountable Data
Schrödinger vs Uncountable Data, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Schrödinger is on 69/100 and Uncountable Data on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Schrödinger
- our overall score: 69/100 against 63/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 1,003 against 170
- funding raised: $220M against $27.0M
- LinkedIn following: 65,181 against 8,216
Uncountable Data
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 45/100
- headcount growth: +41.2% against -8.1%
At a glance
| Measure | Schrödinger | Uncountable Data |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Physics-based software platform for molecular discovery and design in life and materials sciences. | AI-powered platform unifying R&D data for accelerated product development. |
| Category | Drug Discovery, Biotech, Pharmaceuticals, Materials Science | R&D Software, Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), Electronic Lab Notebook (ELN), Data Integration |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1990 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Schrödinger | Uncountable Data |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,003 | 170 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -8.1% | +41.2% |
| Total funding | $220M | $27.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 65,181 | 8,216 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Schrödinger | Uncountable Data |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Schrödinger | Uncountable Data |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Jetpack Stats | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Schrödinger vs Uncountable Data: common questions
Which is better, Schrödinger or Uncountable Data?
On our 0-100 score Schrödinger rates higher (69/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Schrödinger and Uncountable Data compare on the numbers?
Schrödinger leads on our overall score (69/100 against 63/100), domain rating (72/100 against 43/100), headcount (1,003 against 170), funding raised ($220M against $27.0M), LinkedIn following (65,181 against 8,216). Uncountable Data leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 45/100), headcount growth (+41.2% against -8.1%).
Read the full Schrödinger review and pricing or the Uncountable Data review and pricing. You can also browse other Schrödinger alternatives we track.