Sand Security vs Thinking Machines Lab Inc.
Sand Security vs Thinking Machines Lab Inc., compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Sand Security is on 10/100 and Thinking Machines Lab Inc. on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Sand Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Thinking Machines Lab Inc.
- our overall score: 69/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 34/100
At a glance
| Measure | Sand Security | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Sand.ai's Magi-1 is an autoregressive video model delivering top-tier AI solutions for everyone, advancing AI technology. | Frontier AI lab building multimodal AI systems with customizable, collaborative capabilities for enterprise applications, focusing on human-AI collaboration and personalized AI. |
| Category | Foundation Model, Generative AI, Multimodal AI, Video Generation | Frontier AI Lab, AGI Research, Foundation Model, Multimodal AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2026 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | גבעתיים, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Sand Security | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 212 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +283.1% |
| Open roles | Not published | 38 |
| Total funding | Not published | $3.4B |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $12B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 141,099 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Sand Security | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 10/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 18/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Sand Security | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Sand Security | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Thinking Machines wants to build an AI that actually listens while it talks.”r/technology
Sand Security vs Thinking Machines Lab Inc.: common questions
Which is better, Sand Security or Thinking Machines Lab Inc.?
On our 0-100 score Thinking Machines Lab Inc. rates higher (69/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Sand Security and Thinking Machines Lab Inc. compare on the numbers?
Thinking Machines Lab Inc. leads on our overall score (69/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (40/100 against 34/100), domain rating (75/100 against 34/100).
What do real users say about Sand Security and Thinking Machines Lab Inc.?
Thinking Machines Lab Inc.: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/technology.
Read the full Sand Security review and pricing or the Thinking Machines Lab Inc. review and pricing. You can also browse other Sand Security alternatives we track.