Groundcover vs UP9
Groundcover vs UP9, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Groundcover is on 64/100 and UP9 on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Groundcover
- our overall score: 64/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 15/100
- headcount: 129 against 1
- headcount growth: +65.9% against -29.6%
- LinkedIn following: 9,827 against 380
UP9
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Groundcover | UP9 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Kubernetes application monitoring using eBPF for deep visibility and performance insights, offering a cloud-native observability platform. | Autonomous microservice testing platform using ML-generated API test code. |
| Category | Observability, Cloud Infrastructure, Application Performance Monitoring, Infrastructure Monitoring | Microservices, Test Automation, Developer Tools, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Groundcover | UP9 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 129 | 1 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +65.9% | -29.6% |
| Total funding | $155M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,827 | 380 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Groundcover | UP9 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 3/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 15/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Groundcover | UP9 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Groundcover | UP9 |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“We’re part of the founding engineering team at groundcover, building a modern, cloud-native observability platform that’s redefining how teams monitor and troubleshoot applications in Kubernetes environments. Our engineering efforts focus o”r/devops
Groundcover vs UP9: common questions
Which is better, Groundcover or UP9?
On our 0-100 score Groundcover rates higher (64/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Groundcover and UP9 compare on the numbers?
Groundcover leads on our overall score (64/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 21/100), domain rating (68/100 against 15/100), headcount (129 against 1), headcount growth (+65.9% against -29.6%), LinkedIn following (9,827 against 380).
What do real users say about Groundcover and UP9?
Groundcover: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/devops.
Read the full Groundcover review and pricing or the UP9 review and pricing. You can also browse other Groundcover alternatives we track.