Groundcover vs Sumo Logic
Groundcover vs Sumo Logic, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Groundcover is on 64/100 and Sumo Logic on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Groundcover
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Sumo Logic
- domain rating: 78/100 against 68/100
- headcount: 836 against 129
- LinkedIn following: 170,537 against 9,827
At a glance
| Measure | Groundcover | Sumo Logic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Kubernetes application monitoring using eBPF for deep visibility and performance insights, offering a cloud-native observability platform. | Cloud-native observability platform for logs, metrics, and traces. |
| Category | Observability, Cloud Infrastructure, Application Performance Monitoring, Infrastructure Monitoring | Cloud Monitoring & Observability, Observability, Cloud Monitoring, Log Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Redwood City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Groundcover | Sumo Logic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 129 | 836 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +65.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $155M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,827 | 170,537 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Groundcover | Sumo Logic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Groundcover | Sumo Logic |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Groundcover | Sumo Logic |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“We’re part of the founding engineering team at groundcover, building a modern, cloud-native observability platform that’s redefining how teams monitor and troubleshoot applications in Kubernetes environments. Our engineering efforts focus o”r/devops
Groundcover vs Sumo Logic: common questions
Which is better, Groundcover or Sumo Logic?
On our 0-100 score Groundcover rates higher (64/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Groundcover and Sumo Logic compare on the numbers?
Sumo Logic leads on domain rating (78/100 against 68/100), headcount (836 against 129), LinkedIn following (170,537 against 9,827).
What do real users say about Groundcover and Sumo Logic?
Groundcover: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/devops.
Read the full Groundcover review and pricing or the Sumo Logic review and pricing. You can also browse other Groundcover alternatives we track.