Groundcover vs Samuel Calvert
Groundcover vs Samuel Calvert, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Groundcover is on 64/100 and Samuel Calvert on 2/100.
Where each one leads
Groundcover
- our overall score: 64/100 against 2/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 38/100
Samuel Calvert
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Groundcover | Samuel Calvert |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Kubernetes application monitoring using eBPF for deep visibility and performance insights, offering a cloud-native observability platform. | Computer Engineering professional specializing in infrastructure automation, networking, and systems troubleshooting. |
| Category | Observability, Cloud Infrastructure, Application Performance Monitoring, Infrastructure Monitoring | Computer Engineering, Infrastructure Automation, Networking, Systems Troubleshooting |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2021 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | London, England |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Groundcover | Samuel Calvert |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 129 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +65.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $155M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,827 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Groundcover | Samuel Calvert |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 2/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Groundcover | Samuel Calvert |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Groundcover | Samuel Calvert |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“We’re part of the founding engineering team at groundcover, building a modern, cloud-native observability platform that’s redefining how teams monitor and troubleshoot applications in Kubernetes environments. Our engineering efforts focus o”r/devops
Groundcover vs Samuel Calvert: common questions
Which is better, Groundcover or Samuel Calvert?
On our 0-100 score Groundcover rates higher (64/100 against 2/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Groundcover and Samuel Calvert compare on the numbers?
Groundcover leads on our overall score (64/100 against 2/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 38/100).
What do real users say about Groundcover and Samuel Calvert?
Groundcover: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/devops.
Read the full Groundcover review and pricing or the Samuel Calvert review and pricing. You can also browse other Groundcover alternatives we track.