SafeFields Technologies vs Upstream Security
SafeFields Technologies vs Upstream Security, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: SafeFields Technologies is on 16/100 and Upstream Security on 61/100.
Where each one leads
SafeFields Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Upstream Security
- our overall score: 61/100 against 16/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 9/100
- headcount: 164 against 8
- LinkedIn following: 15,111 against 1,776
At a glance
| Measure | SafeFields Technologies | Upstream Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops active field cancellation technology to reduce magnetic fields in electrified vehicles. | Automotive cybersecurity and data management platform for connected vehicles. |
| Category | Automotive, Cybersecurity, Automotive Cybersecurity, Threat Detection | Automotive, Cybersecurity, Connected Vehicle, Automotive Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | SafeFields Technologies | Upstream Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 164 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.6% | +11.7% |
| Total funding | Not published | $104M |
| Latest round | Not published | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,776 | 15,111 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | SafeFields Technologies | Upstream Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 16/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 10/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 27/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 9/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | SafeFields Technologies | Upstream Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
SafeFields Technologies vs Upstream Security: common questions
Which is better, SafeFields Technologies or Upstream Security?
On our 0-100 score Upstream Security rates higher (61/100 against 16/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do SafeFields Technologies and Upstream Security compare on the numbers?
Upstream Security leads on our overall score (61/100 against 16/100), domain rating (66/100 against 9/100), headcount (164 against 8), LinkedIn following (15,111 against 1,776).
Read the full SafeFields Technologies review and pricing or the Upstream Security review and pricing. You can also browse other SafeFields Technologies alternatives we track.