SafeBreach vs XM Cyber
SafeBreach vs XM Cyber, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: SafeBreach is on 61/100 and XM Cyber on 62/100.
Where each one leads
SafeBreach
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 42/100
- headcount growth: +500.0% against +31.4%
- funding raised: $141M against $54.0M
XM Cyber
- headcount: 444 against 141
- LinkedIn following: 35,814 against 23,010
At a glance
| Measure | SafeBreach | XM Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | SafeBreach offers a continuous security validation platform that simulates breach and attack scenarios to identify security gaps. | Automated APT simulation platform to continuously expose and remediate cyber attack vectors. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Breach and Attack Simulation | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Attack Surface Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | SafeBreach | XM Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 141 | 444 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | +31.4% |
| Total funding | $141M | $54.0M |
| Latest round | Series D Extension | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 23,010 | 35,814 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | SafeBreach | XM Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | SafeBreach | XM Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
SafeBreach vs XM Cyber: common questions
Which is better, SafeBreach or XM Cyber?
On our 0-100 score XM Cyber rates higher (62/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do SafeBreach and XM Cyber compare on the numbers?
SafeBreach leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 42/100), headcount growth (+500.0% against +31.4%), funding raised ($141M against $54.0M). XM Cyber leads on headcount (444 against 141), LinkedIn following (35,814 against 23,010).
Read the full SafeBreach review and pricing or the XM Cyber review and pricing. You can also browse other SafeBreach alternatives we track.