SafeBreach vs Seculert
SafeBreach vs Seculert, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: SafeBreach is on 61/100 and Seculert on 42/100.
Where each one leads
SafeBreach
- our overall score: 61/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 46/100
- funding raised: $141M against $15.9M
Seculert
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | SafeBreach | Seculert |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | SafeBreach offers a continuous security validation platform that simulates breach and attack scenarios to identify security gaps. | Seculert provided an attack detection and analytics platform that used machine learning and threat intelligence to identify cyber attacks. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Breach and Attack Simulation | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Network Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2G |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | SafeBreach | Seculert |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 141 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $141M | $15.9M |
| Latest round | Series D Extension | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 23,010 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | SafeBreach | Seculert |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 42/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 10/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 46/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | SafeBreach | Seculert |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | SafeBreach | Seculert |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 3 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Seculert Honored as Coolest Cloud Computing Vendor by CRN | SYS-CON MEDIA.”r/realtech
SafeBreach vs Seculert: common questions
Which is better, SafeBreach or Seculert?
On our 0-100 score SafeBreach rates higher (61/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do SafeBreach and Seculert compare on the numbers?
SafeBreach leads on our overall score (61/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 21/100), domain rating (71/100 against 46/100), funding raised ($141M against $15.9M).
What do real users say about SafeBreach and Seculert?
Seculert: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/realtech.
Read the full SafeBreach review and pricing or the Seculert review and pricing. You can also browse other SafeBreach alternatives we track.