Runtastic vs WHOOP
Runtastic vs WHOOP, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Runtastic is on 60/100 and WHOOP on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Runtastic
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 25/100
WHOOP
- our overall score: 67/100 against 60/100
- funding raised: $575M against $206K
At a glance
| Measure | Runtastic | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A digital health and fitness company offering a suite of apps and hardware for tracking activities and achieving goals. | WHOOP is a wearable coach providing 24/7 health insights to help improve health, fitness, and longevity. |
| Category | Health & Fitness, Mobile Apps, Wearables, HealthTech | Wearables, HealthTech, Fitness Technology, Consumer Electronics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Not published |
| Founded | 2009 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Pasching, Austria | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Runtastic | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 1,228 |
| Total funding | $206K | $575M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series G |
| Valuation | Not published | $10B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 188,354 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Runtastic | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 27/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 16/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 87/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Runtastic | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Runtastic | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | 24/7 Health Monitoring, Personalized Coaching, Medical-Grade Insights, Healthspan Tracking, Customizable Design, Irregular Heart Rhythm Notifications |
Runtastic vs WHOOP: common questions
Which is better, Runtastic or WHOOP?
On our 0-100 score WHOOP rates higher (67/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Runtastic and WHOOP compare on the numbers?
Runtastic leads on agent readiness (35/100 against 25/100). WHOOP leads on our overall score (67/100 against 60/100), funding raised ($575M against $206K).
Read the full Runtastic review and pricing or the WHOOP review and pricing. You can also browse other Runtastic alternatives we track.