Runlayer vs .Tensor Security
Runlayer vs .Tensor Security, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Runlayer is on 54/100 and .Tensor Security on 21/100.
Where each one leads
Runlayer
- our overall score: 54/100 against 21/100
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 47/100
- LinkedIn following: 3,155 against 1,492
.Tensor Security
- headcount: 85 against 30
At a glance
| Measure | Runlayer | .Tensor Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Securely connects AI to enterprise systems with threat detection and access control. | Tensor is the name you can trust in time and attendance, access control, and integrated security systems. |
| Category | Security, Agentic AI, AI Governance, AI Safety | Security, Cybersecurity, Identity & Access, Authentication |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | תל אביב - יפו, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Runlayer | .Tensor Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 30 | 85 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +203.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $22.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,155 | 1,492 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Runlayer | .Tensor Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 21/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 19/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (61/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Runlayer | .Tensor Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Astro |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Plausible |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Runlayer vs .Tensor Security: common questions
Which is better, Runlayer or .Tensor Security?
On our 0-100 score Runlayer rates higher (54/100 against 21/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Runlayer and .Tensor Security compare on the numbers?
Runlayer leads on our overall score (54/100 against 21/100), agent readiness (61/100 against 44/100), domain rating (55/100 against 47/100), LinkedIn following (3,155 against 1,492). .Tensor Security leads on headcount (85 against 30).
Read the full Runlayer review and pricing or the .Tensor Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Runlayer alternatives we track.