Runlayer vs SecurityScorecard
Runlayer vs SecurityScorecard, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Runlayer is on 54/100 and SecurityScorecard on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Runlayer
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 49/100
SecurityScorecard
- our overall score: 61/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 627 against 30
- funding raised: $50.0M against $22.0M
- LinkedIn following: 66,857 against 3,155
At a glance
| Measure | Runlayer | SecurityScorecard |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Securely connects AI to enterprise systems with threat detection and access control. | Security rating firm providing insights into widespread vulnerabilities in OpenClaw deployments. |
| Category | Security, Agentic AI, AI Governance, AI Safety | Security, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Security Ratings |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Runlayer | SecurityScorecard |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 30 | 627 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +203.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $22.0M | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,155 | 66,857 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Runlayer | SecurityScorecard |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (61/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Runlayer | SecurityScorecard |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Runlayer vs SecurityScorecard: common questions
Which is better, Runlayer or SecurityScorecard?
On our 0-100 score SecurityScorecard rates higher (61/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Runlayer and SecurityScorecard compare on the numbers?
Runlayer leads on agent readiness (61/100 against 49/100). SecurityScorecard leads on our overall score (61/100 against 54/100), domain rating (78/100 against 55/100), headcount (627 against 30), funding raised ($50.0M against $22.0M), LinkedIn following (66,857 against 3,155).
Read the full Runlayer review and pricing or the SecurityScorecard review and pricing. You can also browse other Runlayer alternatives we track.